Many of Biden’s Cabinet nominees could be stalled until Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer cut a deal on a resolution outlining how they’ll share power in the Senate, GOP and Democratic senators said Wednesday.
Cotton placed a hold on Haines’ nomination after he asked her to clarify an answer during her Senate Intelligence Committee confirmation hearing about the CIA’s interrogation program during the George W. Bush administration, a Senate GOP aide said.
Cotton was hopeful that he would receive a written response from Haines on Wednesday, known as a “question for the record,” at which point he would lift his hold on Haines’ nomination, the aide said. But Cotton’s hold means it’s unclear whether Haines will get a Senate vote Wednesday. A Democratic Senate aide confirmed Cotton was the reason for a delay on Haines’ confirmation.
“Committees, I think, will be stalled until it’s agreed to,” Sen. Roy Blunt, a member of Senate GOP leadership, said to CNN.
Nevertheless, McConnell has asked Schumer for assurances that the filibuster will be spared, something that Schumer has yet to do. Schumer has called on the Senate rules to mirror the 2001 agreement when the chamber was also initially split 50-50, with both sides holding an equal number of seats on committees and tied votes on legislation and nominations would go straight to the floor.
Schumer said on the Senate floor Wednesday there “may” be a vote later Wednesday evening, signaling the two parties may be close to reaching an agreement to clear at least one key national security nominee.
Cotton wants clarification on interrogation response
Until Haines is confirmed, the director of national intelligence role will be filled in an acting capacity by ODNI Chief Operating Officer Lora Shiao, a senior intelligence official told CNN.
Shiao served as COO under President Donald Trump’s DNI John Ratcliffe, who has left the job as expected.
Haines, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday. Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who is the panel’s acting chairman until Democrats take control of the Senate Wednesday afternoon, said Wednesday that he did not attend Biden’s inauguration ceremony because he was working on Haines’ confirmation.
At CIA, Biden’s pick for deputy director, David Cohen, will serve as acting director until the permanent nominee is confirmed. Biden’s pick for CIA director is former diplomat William Burns.
The GOP aide said Cotton was concerned with Haines’ response to a question from Oregon Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden about accountability inside the CIA over the Bush-era interrogation program that included the use of harsh tactics like waterboarding.
Following a review of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s “torture report” in 2013, Wyden noted that the CIA recommended broadening accountability reviews to include “systemic failures in accountability for individuals who were responsible for the failures.”
“Do you agree with this recommendation, and if you are confirmed would you seek to apply it to the intelligence community?” Wyden asked.
“Yes, senator, I agree with the 2013 recommendation that the Central Intelligence Agency indicated and to broaden the approach of accountability review boards that the report identified,” Haines responded.
Cotton, who did not question Haines during the open hearing Tuesday, asked Haines to clarify her answer during the Senate Intelligence Committee’s subsequent closed session. He asked her to respond in writing, and submitted the question to Haines following the closed session, the aide said.
“During the subsequent closed session, you clarified that, if confirmed, any changes to the structure of accountability review boards or other administrative procedures would be forward looking, and that you would not re-litigate the conclusion of the CIA review into the rendition program or the Obama Administration’s closure of related investigations,” Cotton asked Haines in a written question. “Can you confirm that you will not reinvigorate efforts to prosecute, take administrative action against, or prejudice in any future promotion or selection panels any CIA officer involved with that program under DOJ guidance and Presidential direction?”
This story has been updated with additional developments Wednesday.